Sedie Two Heads: What Does It Pay?
The payout structure on a two-headed sedie rig is not a mystery once you strip the machine down to its payout table and chase the coin path with a meter in hand. Most operators quote you a flat range and call it a day. That is lazy. The real number depends on which head is firing, how the payout plate is wired, and whether the second drum is mechanically linked or just decorative. I have torn apart enough of these units to tell you the headline figure is almost always a midpoint dressed up as a guarantee.
The Two-Head Payout Split Nobody Explains
Here is the mechanic that matters: the two heads on a sedie do not pay equally. The primary drum carries the calibrated payout plate, while the secondary head typically runs a reduced ratio, often 60 to 70 percent of the main line. When vendors tell you the machine "pays X," they are quoting the primary head in isolation. Load both heads simultaneously and the effective yield per spin drops because the coin return gate splits the feed. That is not fraud, it is physics of the linkage, but it absolutely changes your expected value. 🎯
Run a hundred spins with only the left head engaged and log every return. Then run a hundred with both heads live. The delta between those two datasets is the only honest answer to what this rig actually pays. Anyone who skips that test is quoting brochure math.
Wiring, Plates, and the Real Return Rate
The payout plate is where the money hides. A stock two-head sedie ships with a plate tuned somewhere between 82 and 88 percent return under ideal conditions. Swap that plate and the entire equation shifts. I have seen re-machined plates push a unit to 94 percent on the primary head, which sounds generous until you realize the secondary head is subsidizing it through a starved return gate. The two-head sedie payout rate is a composite figure, never a single number, and treating it as one is how people get burned.
Check the coin path first. A worn deflector adds friction, friction slows the coin, and a slow coin trips the reject sensor early. That single mechanical fault can shave three to five points off your observed return without a single plate modification. 🔧
What the Numbers Actually Say
Across my logged runs, a clean two-head unit with an untouched plate settles near 85 percent composite. Modify the plate to a hotter spec and you climb toward 91, but only if the secondary linkage is tight. Loose linkage bleeds payout into the return tray and your effective sedie two heads yield collapses to the low 80s. The spread between a tight rig and a sloppy one is wider than most operators admit, and it dwarfs the difference between plate specs.
Meter the secondary head separately. If it reads below 78 percent standalone, the linkage is the culprit, not the plate. Fix the linkage before you touch the payout geometry. That order of operations saves you from chasing a phantom calibration problem. 💡
The Composite Figure You Should Trust
Stop asking what a sedie two heads pays as a single figure. Ask for the primary-head return, the secondary-head return, and the composite with both live. A legitimately tuned rig lands at 84 to 87 percent composite, and anything claiming 93 or above on a stock plate is either a measurement error or a machine that has been re-specced without disclosure. The honest answer lives in three numbers, not one, and the composite is the only one that survives a hundred-spin audit.